Case ID:169735

Daniel Mutegi Mwenda v John Kathenya Kaibiru & 4 others [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Constitutional Petition E001 of 2020

Parties:

Daniel Mutegi Mwenda v John Kathenya Kaibiru, Cabinet Secretary, Lands and Physical Planning – (Sued through the Deputy County Commissioner – Tharaka Sub County), District Land Registrar (Tharaka Sub County), District Land Surveyor (Tharaka Sub County) & Attorney General

Date Delivered:

08 Feb 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Environment and Land Court at Chuka

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Peter Muchoki Njoroge

Citation:

Daniel Mutegi Mwenda v John Kathenya Kaibiru & 4 others [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Environment and Land

County:

Tharaka Nithi

Case Outcome:

Directions on 2nd March, 2021

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA

CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. E001 OF 2020

IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 22, (3), 23 AND 165 (3) (b) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010

AND

IN THE MATTER OF CONSTITUTION OF RULES UNDER ARTICLES 40 AND 47 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA

AND

IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOM) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES, 2013.

BETWEEN

DANIEL MUTEGI MWENDA............................................................PETITIONER

VERSUS

JOHN KATHENYA KAIBIRU.................................................1

ST

RESPONDENT

THE CABINET SECRETARY, LANDS AND

PHYSICAL PLANNING –

(SUED THROUGH

THE DEPUTY COUNTY COMMISSIONER –

THARAKA SUB COUNTY)

.......................................................2

ND

RESPONDENT

THE DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR

(THARAKA SUB COUNTY)...................................................3

RD

RESPONDENT

THE DISTRICT LAND SURVEYOR

(THARAKA SUB COUNTY)..................................................4

TH

RESPONDENT

THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL........................................5

TH

RESPONDENT

RULING

1. This application is dated

25

th

November, 2020

. The application seeks the following orders:

1. This application be certified urgent and service thereof be dispensed with in the first instance.

2. There be an order of inhibition upon LR NO. North Tharaka/Marimanti/3342 to prevent any subdivision, partition, transfer, alienation or any dealing whatsoever with the same pending the inter-parties hearing and determination of this application.

3. There be an order of inhibition upon LR No. North Tharaka/Marimanti/3342 to prevent any sub division, petition, transfer, alienation or any dealing whatsoever with the same pending the hearing and trial determination of this petition.

4. Costs for this application be provided for.

5. The court do make any other or such better orders which it may deem fit to grant in the circumstances.

2. The application has the following grounds:

i) The subject matter is in danger of alienation since the 1

st

respondent is in the process of disposing it by sale to third parties.

ii) The 1

st

respondent has continuously invoked the illegal title of the suit land to harass the petitioner/applicant by placing unfounded allegations to the OCS (Marimanti Police Station) that the applicant is maliciously damaging properties on the suit land.

iii) If the suit land is alienated, the interests of the applicant over the same will be defeated and/or seriously compromised.

iv) Notwithstanding that the suit land is an offshoot of the illegal partition of LR NO. North Tharaka/Marimanti/1764, there has been no physical subdivision on the ground but the 1

st

respondent is using the alleged subdivision to unlawfully harass the petitioner/applicant.

3. All parties were represented on

15

th

December, 2020

when the matter was fixed to be heard interpartes on

26

th

January, 2021

.

4. The parties were not in court on

26

th

January, 2021

.

5. I note that prayer 1 in the application is spent.

6. Although the parties did not come to court on

26

th

January, 2021

, I find it necessary to have the suit property preserved pending hearing and determination of this petition.

7. As the parties were not in court when this application was slated to be heard, I issue no order as to costs regarding this application.

8. In the circumstances, prayer 3 in the application is granted.

9. Parties will come to court for

directions

on

2

nd

March, 2021

.

10. Orders accordingly.

Delivered in open court at Chuka this

8

th

day of February, 2021

in the presence of:

CA: Ndegwa

Parties not in court

HON. JUSTICE (Dr.) P. M. NJOROGE,

ELC JUDGE.