Case ID:169491

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Phylis Jerotich Mutwol v Emmy Jepkemoi Mutwol & 2 others; Sarah Cheptengeny Busienei (Interested Party) [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Land Case 37 of 2020

Parties:

Phylis Jerotich Mutwol v Emmy Jepkemoi Mutwol, Agricultural Finance Corportation & County Land Registrar, Trans-Nzoia County ; Sarah Cheptengeny Busienei (Interested Party)

Date Delivered:

26 Jan 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Environment and Land Court at Kitale

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Francis Mwangi Njoroge

Citation:

Phylis Jerotich Mutwol v Emmy Jepkemoi Mutwol & 2 others; Sarah Cheptengeny Busienei (Interested Party) [2021] eKLR

Court Division:

Environment and Land

County:

Trans Nzoia

Case Outcome:

Application granted

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT

AT KITALE

LAND CASE NO. 37 OF 2020

PHYLIS JEROTICH MUTWOL..........................................................PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

EMMY JEPKEMOI MUTWOL....................................................1

ST

DEFENDANT

AGRICULTURAL FINANCE CORPORTATION.......................2

ND

DEFENDANT

COUNTY LAND REGISTRAR, TRANS-NZOIA COUNTY......3

RD

DEFENDANT

AND

SARAH CHEPTENGENY BUSIENEI

...................................

INTERESTED PARTY

RULING

The Application

1. By a notice of motion dated

24/6/2020

and filed on the

29/6/2020

brought under

Articles 19, 22, 23, 40, 45(1), 46, 47, 48, 50(1)

and

159

of the

Constitution

,

Sections 1A, 1B, 3A

and

63(e)

of the

Civil Procedure Act, Chapter 21

of the

Laws of Kenya, Order 40 Rules 1

and

4

and

Order 51 Rule 1

of the

Civil Procedure Rules

, the 1

st

and plaintiff/applicant seeks the following orders:

1. …spent

2. …spent

3. The defendants/respondents either jointly or severally be restrained from selling, transferring, leasing out, charging, subdividing or in any other way dealing with the subject parcel of land being Title No. Chepsiro/Kibuswa Block 1/Kelchinet/137 pending hearing and determination of the instant main suit.

4. In the event the 2

nd

defendant/respondent has no more interest on the subject parcel of land, the original title deed be deposited with the honourable court for safe custody.

5. The Directorate of Criminal Investigation to conduct an investigation on the transfer and issuance of the title deed in the name of the 1

st

defendant/respondent to establish whether there was fraud and forgery and file a report before this honourable court before the hearing within 30 days.

6. Costs of the application be awarded to the plaintiff/applicant.

2. The application is supported by the sworn affidavit of the plaintiff and also premised on the grounds summarized at the foot of the application.

3. The plaintiff filed further affidavit sworn on

22/9/2020

.

The Response

4. The 1

st

defendant filed replying affidavit sworn on

14/7/2020

.

5. In reply to affidavits by the plaintiff and Alice Mutenyo Wabala the 1

st

defendant filed a further affidavit sworn on

25/9/2020.

Submissions

6. The application was disposed of by way of written submissions. The 1

st

defendant filed her submissions on

30/11/2020.

The plaintiff filed her submissions on

19/1/2021

.

Determination

7. I have considered the application and the response and the submissions. The issues that arise for determination in the instant application are as follows:

1. Whether an injunction should issue.

2. Whether the title document should be submitted to court for safe custody.

3. Whether the Director of Criminal Investigations should be ordered to conduct an investigation into the transfer and issuance of title deed in the name of the 1

st

defendant to establish if there was forgery and fraud and file a report before this court.

8. The issues are addressed as hereunder:

(1)

Whether an injunction should issue

;

9. In the circumstances of this case which is quite full of controversy it is the opinion of this court that the

status quo

regarding the suit land should be maintained so as to preserve the subject matter of the suit till the end of this litigation.

(2)

Whether the title document should be submitted to court for safe custody

;

10. In respect of this issue I find that it would not be necessary for this court to order that the title document to be submitted to the custody of the court while the holder thereof would still require the same to prove their case before this court in default of which their case may fail. The further reason for declining this order is that this court is in favour of granting an order of

status quo

as per

Issue No. 1

above.

(3)

Whether the director of criminal investigations should be ordered to conduct an investigation into the transfer and issuance of title deed in the name of the 1

st

defendant to stablish if there was forgery and fraud and file a report before this court.

11. On this last issue, I find it unnecessary to order the Director of Criminal Investigations to make the requested investigations. The applicant may be at liberty to report her complaint to the Director who is obliged to accord the matter the attention it deserves and investigate it and proffer the necessary recommendations to the Director of Public Prosecutions on whether to prosecute any person. The court should not direct the Director at this point on how to conduct his duties but it is the hope of the court that upon approaching the Director’s office, the plaintiff will obtain service as a citizen as required by statutes and the Constitution. Therefore this prayer is declined.

12. Consequently I grant

only Prayer No. (3)

of the application dated

24/6/2020.

The costs of the application shall be in the cause.

It is so ordered.

Dated, signed

and

delivered

at

Kitale

via electronic mail

on this

26

th

day of

January,

2021.

MWANGI NJOROGE

JUDGE, ELC, KITALE

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Land Case 37 of 2020', 'Parties:': 'Phylis Jerotich Mutwol v Emmy Jepkemoi Mutwol, Agricultural Finance Corportation & County Land Registrar, Trans-Nzoia County ; Sarah Cheptengeny Busienei (Interested Party)', 'Date Delivered:': '26 Jan 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Civil', 'Court:': 'Environment and Land Court at Kitale', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'Francis Mwangi Njoroge', 'Citation:': 'Phylis Jerotich Mutwol v Emmy Jepkemoi Mutwol & 2 others; Sarah Cheptengeny Busienei (Interested Party) [2021] eKLR', 'Court Division:': 'Environment and Land', 'County:': 'Trans Nzoia', 'Case Outcome:': 'Application granted', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}