Case ID:169243

Frankline Kipsang Chesire v Republic [2021] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Appeal 31 of 2019

Parties:

Frankline Kipsang Chesire v Republic

Date Delivered:

27 Jan 2021

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Kabarnet

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

Justus Momanyi Bwonwong'a

Citation:

Frankline Kipsang Chesire v Republic [2021] eKLR

Advocates:

Mr. Mong’are for the Respondent.

Case History:

(Being an appeal from the original sentence of Hon V.O. Amboko, RM, dated 13th May 2019 in Criminal Case No 625 of 2018 in the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kabarnet, Republic v Frankline Kipsang Chesire)

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Baringo

Advocates:

Mr. Mong’are for the Respondent.

History Docket No:

Criminal Case 625 of 2018

History Magistrate:

Hon V.O. Amboko, RM

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

History County:

Baringo

Case Outcome:

Appellant released

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT KABARNET

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 31 OF 2019

FRANKLINE KIPSANG CHESIRE....................................................APPELLANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC..........................................................................................RESPONDENT

(Being an appeal from the original sentence of Hon V.O. Amboko,

RM, dated 13

th

May 2019 in Criminal Case No 625 of 2018 in the Senior

Principal Magistrate’s Court at Kabarnet, Republic v Frankline Kipsang Chesire)

JUDGMENT

In his petition to this court the appellant has challenged his sentence of three years’ imprisonment in respect of the offence of stealing by servant contrary to section 281 of the Penal Code (Cap 63) Laws of Kenya.

Mr. Mong’are for the respondent has left the issue of sentence to the court to decide.

In his oral submissions in this court, the appellant submitted that he is only left with about four months to complete his sentence. He has therefore urged the court to order for his release from prison.

I find that the appellant was arrested on 23/7/2018. Thereafter he was released on bail on 7/8/2018. It is clear that the appellant was in pre-trial custody for fourteen days.

In sentencing the appellant, the trial court did not take into account the fourteen days the appellant had been in custody. The court was mandatorily required by section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75) Laws of Kenya to take that period into account when sentencing the appellant. The failure to do so amounts to an error of law that entitles this court to interfere with the discretion exercised by the trial court.

In the circumstances I find that the interests of justice have been served for the period the appellant has been in prison.

In the premises, the appellant is hereby ordered released forthwith unless he is held on other lawful warrants.

Judgment dated, signed and delivered in open court at Kabarnet this 27

th

day of January 2021.

J M BWONWONG’A

JUDGE

In the presence of

Mr. Kemboi Court Assistant.

Appellant in person present.

Mr. Mong’are for the Respondent.