Case ID:169077

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Kadere Peasants Development (Public Limited Company) Plc v Brazafric Enterprises Limited [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Case E554 of 2020

Parties:

Kadere Peasants Development (Public Limited Company) Plc v Brazafric Enterprises Limited

Date Delivered:

25 Jan 2021

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

David Amilcar Shikomera Majanja

Citation:

Kadere Peasants Development (Public Limited Company) Plc v Brazafric Enterprises Limited [2020] eKLR

Advocates:

S. M. Kitonga and Company Advocates for the Plaintiff.

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Nairobi

Advocates:

S. M. Kitonga and Company Advocates for the Plaintiff.

History Advocates:

One party or some parties represented

Case Outcome:

Summons allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

MILIMANI COMMERCIAL & TAX DIVISION

CORAM: D. S. MAJANJA J.

CIVIL CASE NO. E554 OF 2020

IN THE MATTER OF THE

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT

BETWEEN

KADERE PEASANTS DEVELOPMENT (PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY) PLC.......PLAINTIFF

AND

BRAZAFRIC ENTERPRISES LIMITED .......................................................................DEFENDANT

RULING

1. The Originating Summons before the Court is dated 22

nd

December 2020 made under

section 5

of the

Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act (Chapter 43 of the Laws of Kenya)

(“the

Act

”). In the summons, the Plaintiff seeks the following main order:

[1] THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to register the Judgment issued by the

High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania at Mwanza (Commercial Division) in Commercial Case No. 3 of 2014

for the purpose of enforcement.

2. The summons is supported by the affidavit of the Plaintiff’s Managing Director, Leonard Faustin Kachebonaho, sworn on 22

nd

December 2020. The deposition shows that the Defendant is a judgment debtor following determination by the courts in the United Republic of Tanzania (“Tanzania”) and that to date the Defendant has not satisfied the judgment adjudicated by those courts.

3. On 3

rd

April 2013, Plaintiff herein filed suit against the Defendant at the High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania, Commercial Division at Mwanza;

Commercial Case No. 03 of 2014, Kaderes Peasants Development PLC v Brazafric Enterprises Ltd

claiming, inter alia, damages for breach of contract. On 3

rd

June 2016, the court entered default judgment upon failure of the Defendant to filed its Statement of Defence despite service of summons upon it.

4. According to the proceedings, the Defendant filed an application to set aside the judgment by the same was dismissed on 5

th

September 2014. It filed an appeal in the Court of Appeal, Tanzania; Civil Appeal No. 123 of 2014 but the appeal was struck out on 11

th

December 2015. The Defendant successfully applied for extension of time to appeal but failed to the Notice of Appeal. Its application to seek extension was struck out on 1

st

November 2018 and the subsequent application to the Court of Appeal, Tanzania; Civil Application No. 32 of 2008 was struck out on 9

th

October 2019. On 13

th

November 2020, the High Court approved the Forms necessary for the Plaintiff to execute the judgment in Kenya.

5. The Summons is supported by duly certified copy of the Judgment and proceedings of the High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania, Mwanza Commercial Division, Commercial Case No. 3 of 2014. It is accompanied by Certificate issued under

section 5(4)

of the

Act

confirming that the Defendant made personal appearance through its Principal Officer but never filed a defence, that there was a right of appeal and the appeal instituted in the Court of Appeal, Tanzania was struck out, that there is no appeal pending and that the time for lodging such appeal has now expired. The Plaintiff has also provided certified copies of proceedings to support it case.

6. Based on all the evidence submitted, I am satisfied that the Defendant duly participated in the proceedings before the courts Tanzania hence this summons may be heard ex-parte.

7. As the Plaintiff has complied with the

Foreign Judgment (Reciprocal Enforcement) Rules

and noting that the United Republic of Tanzania is one of the reciprocating countries under

section 13

of the

Act

, I allow the summons dated 22

nd

December 2020 and order as follows:

(a) THAT the judgment issued by the

High Court of the United Republic of Tanzania at Mwanza (Commercial Division) in Commercial Case No. 3 of 2014

be and is hereby registered.

(b) THAT notice of registration of the judgment do issue and the same shall be served upon the Defendant.

(c) The Defendant shall bear costs of the application.

DATED

and

DELIVERED

at

NAIROBI

this

25

th

day of

JANUARY,

2021.

DAVID S. MAJANJA

JUDGE

Court Assistant: Mr. M. Onyango

Ms Kitonga instructed by S. M. Kitonga and Company Advocates for the Plaintiff.

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Civil Case E554 of 2020', 'Parties:': 'Kadere Peasants Development (Public Limited Company) Plc v Brazafric Enterprises Limited', 'Date Delivered:': '25 Jan 2021', 'Case Class:': 'Civil', 'Court:': 'High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'David Amilcar Shikomera Majanja', 'Citation:': 'Kadere Peasants Development (Public Limited Company) Plc v Brazafric Enterprises Limited [2020] eKLR', 'Advocates:': 'S. M. Kitonga and Company Advocates for the Plaintiff.', 'Court Division:': 'Civil', 'County:': 'Nairobi', 'History Advocates:': 'One party or some parties represented', 'Case Outcome:': 'Summons allowed', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}