Case ID:168821

Otieno Ragot Co. Advocates v Winam Chemists Limited [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Miscellaneous Civil Application 54 of 2019

Parties:

Otieno Ragot Co. Advocates v Winam Chemists Limited

Date Delivered:

16 Dec 2020

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Kisumu

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Fred Andago Ochieng

Citation:

Otieno Ragot Co. Advocates v Winam Chemists Limited [2020] eKLR

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Kisumu

Case Outcome:

Judgment entered in favour of the Applicant

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU

MISC. CIVIL CASE NO. 54 OF 2019

OTIENO RAGOT CO. ADVOCATES.........APPLICANT/ADVOCATES

-VERSUS-

WINAM CHEMISTS LIMITED........................................RESPONDENT

RULING

The application before me was brought pursuant to the provisions of

Section 51 (2)

of the

Advocates Act

.

1.

The Applicant,

OTIENO, RAGOT & COMPANY ADVOCATES

have asked the court to adopt the Certificate of Costs herein as a Judgment of the court.

2.

The Respondent,

WINAM CHEMISTS LIMITED

did not respond to the application, although they had been duly served.

3.

In effect, the application was un-opposed.

4.

Notwithstanding the absence of any answer to the said application, I hold the considered view that the Court was obliged to give due consideration to the question about whether or not the principal sum ought to attract interest from 5

th

August 2018, as claimed.

5.

The reason cited by the Applicant, for asking that interest should run from that date is that the Applicant first sent its Proforma Invoice to the Respondent on 5

th

July 2018.

6.

Black’s Law Dictionary

defines the word

“Proforma”

as follows;

“ Latin ‘for form’.

1.Made or done as a formality and not

involving any actual choice or decision.

2.(of an invoice or financial statement)

provided in advance to describe items,

predict results, or secure approval.”

7.

In so far as the document which was sent by the Applicant was a Proforma Invoice, it can be deemed to be an advance description of what the Applicant intended to charge.

8.

A proforma invoice does not give rise to any legal obligations upon the person to whom it is addressed.

9.

Secondly, the proforma invoice does not give rise to any legal obligations upon the person who sent it.

10.

In contrast, an Invoice is deemed to be an asset for the person who sent it. On the basis of an Invoice, the tax authority becomes entitled to demand payment of tax.

11.

In contrast, the

Black’s Law Dictionary

defines a

“Proforma Invoice”

as;

“A bill-like document that is sent to a

customer to show what the price would

be if the customer placed an order.”

12.

The Proforma Invoice may look like an invoice or a bill, but it is not.

13.

When an advocate has rendered services, he becomes entitled to raise either a fee-note or an invoice.

14.

Rule 7

of the

Advocates Remuneration Order

provides as follows;

“An advocate may charge interest at

14% per annum on his disbursements

and costs, whether by scale or

otherwise, from the expiration of one

month from the delivery of his bill to

the client, providing such claim for

interest is raised before the amount

of the bill has been paid or tendered

in full.”

15.

Whereas the Applicant herein endorsed a Notice upon the Proforma Invoice, that the

“bill”

would attract interest at 14% per annum from the date of the said bill, if it was not settled in full within 30 days, that did not alter the fact that the Proforma Invoice did not constitute the bill or invoice. It definitely looked like a bill, but it was not a bill.

16.

In the event, the date when the Proforma Invoice was sent to the Respondent cannot be the point of reference when determining the date from when interest is calculable.

17.

Accordingly, I now enter judgment in favour of the Applicant for the taxed costs, in the sum of Kshs 248,172/90 plus interest thereon at 14% per annum from 20

th

June 2020, until payment in full. The date from when interest has been awarded is 30 days from the date of the taxation.

18.

I also award to the Applicant, the costs of the application dated 28

th

July 2020.

DATED, SIGNED

and DELIVERED at KISUMU

This

16

th

day of

December

2020

FRED A. OCHIENG

JUDGE