Case ID:168744

George Karanja on behalf of Alliance of Slum Media Organizations v County Director of Social Services (Nairobi) Ministry of East African Community & Regional Development & another [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Judicial Review Application Miscellaneous E080 of 2020

Parties:

George Karanja on behalf of Alliance of Slum Media Organizations v County Director of Social Services (Nairobi) Ministry of East African Community & Regional Development & Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited

Date Delivered:

22 Dec 2020

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Pauline Nyamweya

Citation:

George Karanja on behalf of Alliance of Slum Media Organizations v County Director of Social Services (Nairobi) Ministry of East African Community & Regional Development & another [2020] eKLR

Court Division:

Judicial Review

County:

Nairobi

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. MISC. E080 OF 2020

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI AND INJUNCTION

BETWEEN

GEORGE KARANJA on behalf of

ALLIANCE OF SLUM MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS

............................

APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL SERVICES

(NAIROBI)

MINISTRY OF EAST AFRICAN

COMMUNITY

&

REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT .........................

1

ST

R

ESPONDENT

THE CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA

LIMITED

.......................................................................................

2

ND

R

ESPONDENT

RULING

1. The Applicant herein have filed an application by way of a Chamber Summons dated 21

st

December 2020, seeking the following orders:

a) THAT the Court be pleased to grant leave to the Applicant to apply for an order of Certiorari to remove to this Court and to quash

the

decision made by the 1st Respondent on or about 1st December 2020,

suspending the operations of the Applicant's bank account numbers

[xxxx], [xxxx] AND [xxxx]

\.[xxxx]

.

b)

THAT

this Court be pleased to grant leave to the Applicant to apply for an order of Prohibition directed at the 1st Respondent, prohibiting

him from hearing any complaint or making any decision, adverse or

otherwise regarding the Applicant's bank account numbers [xxxx],

[xxxx]and [xxxx].

c)

THAT

the grant of leave as prayed by the Applicant herein does operate as a stay of the decision made by the Respondent, suspending the operations of the Applicants bank account numbers [xxxx], [xxxx]

and

[xxxx]

or implementation of the decision by the 2nd Respondent.

d)

THAT

this Court be pleased to grant an order of Injunction

directed at the 2nd Respondent herein restraining it from implementing the

administrative decision of the 1st Respondent or further freezing the

Applicant's bank account numbers [xxxx], [xxxx] and [xxxx]

pending the determination of the present

application.

e)

THAT

the Court be pleased to grant leave to the applicant to

apply for order of assessment of damages and compensation to be paid by

the 1st and 2nd Respondents.

f)

THAT

the costs of this application be provided for

2. The grounds for the application are stated in the Applicant’s statutory statement dated 21

st

December 2020, and a verifying affidavit sworn on the same date by the Applicant. The Applicant’s Advocate, George Lwande, also filed a supporting affidavit sworn on 21

st

December 2020.

3. The main grounds for the application are that the 1st Respondent has made a decision to suspend the operations of the Applicant's bank account numbers [xxxx], [xxxx] and [xxxx]. held with the interested party, without giving the Applicant prior and adequate notice nor reasons for the said administrative action, and without according the Applicant an opportunity to be heard and make representations, contrary to the provisions of section 4 of the Fair Administration Act.

4. Further, that the 1st and 2nd Respondents have refused to provide the Applicant with a copy of the letter embodying the decision of the 1st Respondent or any documentation on the suspension of the bank accounts despite repeated requests by the applicant and their advocates on record.

5. After perusal of the pleadings, I note that the Applicant has not annexed any evidence of the impugned decision by the 1

st

Respondent, nor of the alleged request for the decision by its Advocates. The Advocate in this regard has averred to visits and telephone calls made to the 1

st

Respondent which are not supported by any evidence.

6. In addition, the Applicant has averred that there is a dispute between him and former officials of his organization which is the subject matter of court proceedings in

NRB CM MCCC Case No 2651 of 2020

which is currently pending at the Chief Magistrate Court, Milimani Law Courts and which the 2nd Respondent herein is a party. Lastly, the suspension of the Applicant’s organization accounts are an issue in the said judicial proceedings. The Applicant annexed copies of pleadings filed in the said case.

7. In the premises I find that not only has the Applicant not demonstrated that he has an arguable case, but that the application by Chamber Summons application dated 21

st

December 2020 is also brought in abuse of the process of court.

8. I accordingly strike out the Chamber Summons application dated 21

st

December 2020 with no order as to costs.

9. Orders accordingly.

DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 22

ND

DAY OF DECEMBER 2020

P. NYAMWEYA

JUDGE