Case ID:168483

Republic v Peter Kiprono Siglai [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Case 7 of 2020

Parties:

Republic v Peter Kiprono Siglai

Date Delivered:

16 Dec 2020

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Bomet

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Roseline Lagat-Korir

Citation:

Republic v Peter Kiprono Siglai [2020] eKLR

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Bomet

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT BOMET

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 7 OF 2020

REPUBLIC..................................................................................PROSECUTOR

VERSUS

PETER KIPRONO SIGLAI..............................................................ACCUSED

RULING

1. The accused Peter Kiprono Siglai is charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. He is alleged to have murdered Kenneth Kiprotich Kosgei on the 27

th

day of March 2020 at Kapkimolwa, Keneni village within Bomet County.

2. The accused took plea on 3/11/2020 and denied the charge. His counsel Ms. Chemutai asked the court to direct the filing of a pre-bail report. When the matter came up on 2/12/2020, Ms. Chirchir made an application for the accused to be released on bail pending trial and prayed for favourable bond terms. On his part, Mr. Mureithi Principal Prosecution Counsel submitted that the prosecution had no compelling reasons and left the matter to the court’s discretion.

3. I have considered the application. Needless to state, the Accused person has a constitutional right to bail or bond pending trial. The only limitation under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution is where there are compelling reasons not to grant bail. It is the practice that such reasons should be brought before the court by the prosecution. It is however trite that the court retains the discretion to grant or deny bail while taking into consideration the circumstances of each case.

4. In this case, the pre-bail report states that the accused lost his temper and killed the deceased who was alleged to be his wife’s lover. The report does not go further to show the circumstances of the offence and only states that both the victim’s family and the accused’s family were supportive of his release on bond. In sum, the report is not comprehensive and does not assist the court in appreciating the home environment as required.

5. In the circumstances of this case, I am persuaded not to grant the accused bond. He shall remain in custody pending trial or until further orders of this court.

6. Orders accordingly.

Ruling delivered, dated and signed this 16

th

day of December, 2020.

..............................

R. LAGAT-KORIR

JUDGE

Ruling delivered in the presence of the Accused, Ms. Chemutai holding brief for Mr. Kadet, Mr. Mureithi for the DPP, and Kiprotich (Court Assistant).