Case ID:167855
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Eddy Nicholas O. Orinda v Highgrove Holdings Limited [2020] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Miscellaneous Civil Application 256 of 2019
Parties:
Eddy Nicholas O. Orinda T/A One and Associates Llp v Highgrove Holdings Limited
Date Delivered:
16 Dec 2020
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Wilfrida Adhiambo Okwany
Citation:
Eddy Nicholas O. Orinda v Highgrove Holdings Limited [2020] eKLR
Court Division:
Civil
County:
Nairobi
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL AND TAX DIVISION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.256 OF 2019
EDDY NICHOLAS O. ORINDA T/A
ONE AND ASSOCIATES LLP...........................APPLICANT/ADVOCATE
-VERSUS-
HIGHGROVE HOLDINGS LIMITED ................RESPONDENT/CLIENT
RULING
1. This ruling is in respect to the application dated 27
th
July 2020 wherein the Advocate/Applicant seeks orders as follows: -
1. That judgment and decree be and is hereby entered and issued on behalf of the applicant against the respondent for Kshs 40, 460,318/- on account of taxed advocate –client legal costs.
2. That interest and costs of this application and of execution be to the applicant.
2. The application is supported by the advocate’s affidavit and is premised on the grounds that: -
1. That the applicant has taxed his advocate-client bill of costs and has been awarded the amount the subject hereto and certificate of taxation issued thereafter.
2. That retainer was never disputed during the taxing of the costs, or at all.
3. That demand and notice of execution has been made but without success.
3. The Respondent did not oppose the application despite proper service with the same as shown in the affidavit of service dated 14
th
December 2020.
4. Consequently, I allow the application dated 27
th
July 2020 as prayed.
Dated, signed and delivered via Microsoft Teams at Nairobi this 16
th
day of December 2020
in view of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due to Covid -19 pandemic and in light of the directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice on the 17
th
April 2020.
W. A. OKWANY
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Orinda for the applicant.
No appearance for the respondent.
Court Assistant: Sylvia