Case ID:167843

In re Estate of Mutuamwari Muga (Deceased) [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Succession Cause 664 of 2015

Parties:

In re Estate of Mutuamwari Muga (Deceased)

Date Delivered:

10 Dec 2020

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Meru

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

Alfred Mabeya

Citation:

In re Estate of Mutuamwari Muga (Deceased) [2020] eKLR

Court Division:

Civil

County:

Meru

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU

SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 664 OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MUTUAMWARI MUGA (DECEASED)

BERNARD RAIBU EPHANTUS ...... 1

ST

PETITIONER

MERCY UKIMA ............................. 2

ND

PETITIONER

VERSUS

WK..........................................................PROTESTOR

J U D G M E N T

1.

Mutuamwari Muga

(“the deceased”)

passed on 15/11/1977. Prior to his demise, he was domiciled at

Kathathi

. According to the letter of introduction dated 18/6/2015, he left behind the following beneficiaries i.e.

Benard Raibu, Mercy Ukima, Rita Kagendo, Janet Kathambi, Timothy Bundi, Micheal Mugo (deceased), Florence Gakii (deceased), Phineas Kaburu (deceased), Gerald Meru (deceased), Lawrence Kimathi (deceased) and Jeremy Mutembei (deceased).

2.

Bernard Raibu Ephantus and Mercy Ukima

petitioned for letters of administration on 30/9/2015. Parcel No.

Igoji/Mweru I/158

was listed as the only asset of the deceased

.

Grant of letters of administration was issued to the petitioners on 29/2/2016.

3.

WK

filed an affidavit on 1/11/2016 stating that the petitioners had failed to disclose that she was the sole daughter of

Jeremy Mutembei (deceased)

who was a direct beneficiary of the estate. She subsequently filed an affidavit of protest in which she gave her own proposal how the estate should be distributed. On the other hand, the petitioners filed a summons for confirmation of grant on 1/2/2018 wherein they also set out their proposed mode of distribution.

4. The protest was heard by way of

viva voce

evidence.

Pw1 WK

testified that she was a daughter to Jeremy Mutembei. That her mother had separated with Jeremy when she was very young. She grew up in the home of the deceased being looked after by the wife of the deceased. That she was later taken over by her uncle

Micheal Mugo

with whom she lived in Marsabit.

5. She further told the Court that the petitioners had not only excluded her, but they had also excluded her uncles

Micheal Mugo

and

Gerald Meru

from the distribution. The two had left behind children. She admitted not having gone to secondary school. She did not have any birth certificate to prove her paternity as she had never seen any.

6.

Pw2 Timothy Bundi,

a brother to the petitioner, testified that the protestor was a child of

Jeremy Mutembei

. That she was born at their home and schooled there. That

Micheal Mugo,

his eldest brother had four (4) children i.e

.

Ephantus Muriuki Mugo, Mark Morris Murithi, Lilian Gaki Mugo, Pamela Nkatha Mugo

who had been left out by the petitioners. He supported the protestors’ mode of distribution. He admitted having sold a ¼ of his share in 2013.

7.

Pw3 Lillain Gaki

testified that she was a daughter of

Michael Mugo.

That the protestor grew up with her family in Marsabit where her father was living. The protestor had come to reside with them from when she was in class 5.

8.

Pw4 Ephantus Mutuma Bundi,

a son to

Timothy Bundi

testified that he knew the protestor. He last saw her at the estate property when their grandmother was alive.

Pw5 Mark Morris Murithi

echoed the testimony of

Pw4.

9.

Pw6 ER

testified that she was not married to

Jeremy

but bore with him a child in the year 1983. That after giving birth to the protestor, she left the notification birth and clinic card at the home of

Jeremy

. She brought the protestor to live with Jeremy when the protestor was only 3 years old.

10.

RW1 Mercy Ukima

testified that the family had agreed to the mode of distribution at the chief’s office. That it had been agreed that her co-petitioner was to hold three (3) acres for

Gerald Meru

and

Micheal Mugo

.

11. According to her, her sisters

Rita Kagendo and Janet Kathambi

had signed consents for her to hold the one (1) acre on their behalf. That

Jeremy Mutembei

died while in Meru GK Prison. At the time of his demise, there was no indication that he had left behind any child. That had the protestor brought a birth certificate, there would be no objection from their end. She confirmed that

Michael Mugo

had left behind four children while Gerald had left behind one child,

Benard Kibaara

.

12.

Rw2 Japheth Kirimi Muga

testified that the deceased was his elder brother. That Nyaga-advocate had brought him the affidavit dated 19/2/2018 at his house at night which he signed without knowing it contents.

13.

Rw3 Benard Kibaara

testified that he is a son to

Gerald Meru

. He denied knowing the protestor as their family was big and divided. He was very young when

Jeremy

was alive and did not know whether he had a wife.

14. From the evidence on record, the two issues for determination are;

who are the beneficiaries of the Deceased and how shall the estate of the deceased be distributed.

15. On the first issue, it was not in dispute that the late Jeremy was a child of the deceased and was entitled to a share in the estate. The protestor told the Court that she was born to the late

Jeremy

in 1983. That after she was born, her mother

Pw6

left her with

Jeremy

and she was looked after by

Jeremy’s

mother, the wife of the deceased.

16. It was her testimony that she grew up with that family and after the demise of

Jeremy

, she was taken over by one of

Jeremy’s

brothers by the name

Michael Mugo,

also deceased. She lived with

Mugo’s

family at Marsabit. She did not go to secondary school. Her testimony was supported by her witnesses.

17. The protestor’s mother appeared and testified as

Pw6

. She told the court that she was not married to

Jeremy

but they had a relationship that resulted in the birth of the protestor. That when the protestor was three years old, she took her to her father,

Jeremy

and the latter’s family brought her up.

18. On their part, the petitioners refuted the protestor’s case. They insisted that the protestor should produce a birth certificate to prove her paternity. According to them, they had never seen her at their home. That it was an attempt by their brother

Pw2

to get an additional share and sell.

19.

In re Estate of Ndongu Kabugua (Deceased) [2019] Eklr,

the court held as follows;

“… It is accepted practice that where one wishes to prove that the deceased is the father of the children, birth certificates, identity cards, baptism cards or any other relevant documentation is tendered in evidence. The children may also be called as witnesses. ... Where evidence which would otherwise assist a party’s case is not tendered, the court must draw an inference that if such evidence is tendered it would be detrimental to the party’s case. …”

20. While I agree with the holding that documentary evidence by way of birth certificate or clinic cards are significant in proving paternity, other independent satisfactory oral evidence can be sufficient in the absence of such documentary evidence.

21. In the present case, the protestor is said to have been left to

Jeremy,

at a tender age of 3 years. She was brought up by

Jeremy’s

mother.

Jeremy

himself died while the protestor was still a child. She was taken care of by one of

Jeremy’

s brothers

Michaeal Mugo.

She never went to school beyond class 8. With such a background, it would be foolhardy to insist that the protestor produces a birth certificate.

22. There is the independent evidence of her mother,

Pw6

and her Cousins

Pw3, Pw4 and Pw5.

The Cousins would gain nothing by lying. Indeed, they would stand to lose by having their share reduced by testifying in favour of the protestor. They appeared to me to be truthful and well-meaning unlike the petitioner and her witnesses. The evidence of the petitioner and her witnesses was self-serving. I did not believe their testimony.

23. In this regard, I am satisfied that the protestor was a child born out of a relationship between

Pw6

and

Jeremy.

She was abandoned by her mother in the home of the deceased who took care of her. That is why, once

Jeremy

passed on, the protestor was taken care of by one of his brothers,

Michael Mugo.

24. From the evidence on record,

Gerald Meru and Micheal Mugo

left behind children. Such children step into the shoes of their parents under

section 41 of the Law of Succession Act.

I therefore make a finding that the deceased left behind the following beneficiaries;

Benard Raibu, Mercy Ukima, Rita Kagendo, Janet Kathambi, Jeremy Mutembei (deceased), Timothy Bundi, Micheal Mugo (deceased), Florence Gakii (deceased), Gerald Meru (deceased),

25. The next issue is the distribution of the estate. The deceased left behind sons and daughters. His estate shall therefore be distributed in line with

Section 38 of the Law of Succession Act.

26. In view of the foregoing, I allow the protest. The estate of the deceased shall therefore be distributed as follows: -

IGOJI/MWERU I/158 (2.30 HA)

a) Benard Raibu - 0.71 Acres

b) Mercy Ukima - 0.71 Acres

c) Rita Kagendo - 0.71 Acres

d) Janet Kathambi - 0.71 Acres

e) Timothy Bundi - 0.71 Acres

f)

Ephantus Muriuki Mugo

Mark Morris Murithi

Lilian Gakii Mugo - O.71 Acres

Equally

Pamela Nkatha

Benard Kibaara - 0.71 Acres

27. This being a family matter, each party to bear own costs.

SIGNED

at Nairobi.

A. MABEYA, FCIArb

JUDGE

DATED

and

DELIVERED

at Meru this 10

th

day of December, 2020.

JUDGE