Case ID:167495

Republic v Bernard Cheruiyot Korir [2020

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Case 6 of 2020

Parties:

Republic v Bernard Cheruiyot Korir

Date Delivered:

03 Dec 2020

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Bomet

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Roseline Lagat-Korir

Citation:

Republic v Bernard Cheruiyot Korir [2020

Advocates:

Defence Counsel Mr Kenduiwo, Mr. Mureithi for the DPP

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Bomet

Advocates:

Defence Counsel Mr Kenduiwo, Mr. Mureithi for the DPP

History Advocates:

One party or some parties represented

Case Outcome:

Application allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT BOMET

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 6 OF 2020

REPUBLIC...............................................................................................................DPP

VERSUS

BERNARD CHERUIYOT KORIR.............................................................ACCUSED

RULING ON BAIL

1. The Accused is charged with the offence of murder contrary to section 203 as read with section 204 of the Penal Code Cap 63 Laws of Kenya. The particulars of the offence are on the 21st day of March, 2020, at Kabolwo Village in Chepalungu Sub – County within Bomet County murdered Josiah Kipkorir Lang’at.

2. The Accused took plea on 16

th

June,2020 before Ongeri J and denied the charge. On the same date, Mr. Nyadimo his defence counsel made an oral application for the accused to be released on bail pending trial. The application was allowed and the accused granted bond of three hundred thousand (Kshs.300,000/=). When the matter came up before me on 26

th

October, 2020, Mr Kenduiwo for the Accused sought a review of the bond stating that the Accused could not afford the bond granted.

3. The review application was opposed by the prosecution. Mr. Waweru submitted that nothing had been placed before the court to demonstrate that the accused had made an attempt to meet the bond terms. In order to get a view of the Accused’s socio economic circumstances, the court directed that a social inquiry report be filed. The same was filed on 10

th

November, 2020.

4. I have considered the review application. I must state that in matters of bond, the accused is entitled to such a review where there is sufficient reason. The probation report sets out the circumstances of the offence and says nothing about the ability or otherwise of the accused’s parents or guardians to raise the set bond. The report however states the willingness of the parents to stand surety for him. It also indicates that the Accused’s family has reached out to the Deceased’s family to attempt reconciliation and that therefore there was no hostility on the ground. In sum, the report is favourable to the Accused. I affirm his right to bond and reduce the bond terms from Kshs.300,000/= to Kshs.200,000/= with one surety of similar amount. In addition, the Accused is directed not to interfere with witnesses or impede the trial in any way.

5. Orders accordingly.

Sentence delivered, dated and signed this 3rd day of December, 2020.

..........................

R. LAGAT-KORIR

JUDGE

Sentence delivered in the presence of the Accused, Defence Counsel Mr Kenduiwo, Mr. Mureithi for the DPP, and Kiprotich (Court Assistant).