Case ID:166614

Republic v Jacinta Aluoch Odhiambo, County Secretary, Kakamega County & another [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Judicial Review 30 of 2020

Parties:

Republic v Jacinta Aluoch Odhiambo, County Secretary, Kakamega County & Geoffrey Nafuko Omulayi, Finance Officer/Treasurer, Kakamega County

Date Delivered:

20 Nov 2020

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Kakamega

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

William Musya Musyoka

Citation:

Republic v Jacinta Aluoch Odhiambo, County Secretary, Kakamega County & another [2020] eKLR

Court Division:

Judicial Review

County:

Kakamega

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA

JUDICIAL REVIEW NO. 30 OF 2020

REPUBLIC

.................................................................................APPLICANT

VERSUS

JACINTA ALUOCH ODHIAMBO, COUNTY

SECRETARY, KAKAMEGA COUNTY

.......................1

ST

RESPONDENT

GEOFFREY NAFUKO OMULAYI,

FINANCE OFFICER/

TREASURER, KAKAMEGA COUNTY

......................2

ND

RESPONDENT

RULING

1. What is for determination is the Motion dated 7

th

July 2020, seeking a

mandamus

order against the respondents, with respect to enforcement of an order and a money decree made in Kakamega HC Misc. No. 157 of 2014 and Civil Suit No. 14 of 2017. The same was canvassed by way of written submissions. Both sides filed detailed written submissions, supported by case law.

2. From the filings, both the submissions and the affidavits, it emerged that there is an appeal against the decree in Kakamega HC Misc. No. 157 of 2014 and Civil Suit No. 14 of 2017, being Kisumu CACA No. 54 of 2020. Clearly, therefore, the decree on record is not final.

3. The order of

mandamus

is issued in execution or enforcement of a decree against government. Ideally, where an appeal pends against an order or decree, the same does not operate as a stay of enforcement of the decree or order. However, pendency of an appeal is evidence that the litigation is not yet complete or finalized over the matter in dispute or controversy. A determination of the appeal in favour of the appellant could have serious consequences, where the decree has since been enforced by way of execution.

4. In view of the above, I am of the view that this court should not consider the Motion before it on the

mandamus

order. Let the respondents exhaust the appeal options available to them before the Motion is determined, for the court should not act in vain. Determination of the Motion, dated 7

th

July 2020, is therefore, to be held in abeyance, pending hearing and determination of the appeal in Kisumu CACA No. 54 of 2020.

5. It is so ordered.

DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS.....

20

th

.......DAY OF.......November........2020

W MUSYOKA

JUDGE