Case ID:165405
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Republic v Samuel Kenini Keiwua [2020] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Criminal Case 40 of 2017
Parties:
Republic v Samuel Kenini Keiwua
Date Delivered:
28 Oct 2020
Case Class:
Criminal
Court:
High Court at Narok
Case Action:
Judgment
Judge(s):
Justus Momanyi Bwonwong'a
Citation:
Republic v Samuel Kenini Keiwua [2020] eKLR
Advocates:
Ms. Torosi for the Republic and Mr. Tanyasis h/b for Mr. Kilele for the accused
Court Division:
Criminal
County:
Narok
Advocates:
Ms. Torosi for the Republic and Mr. Tanyasis h/b for Mr. Kilele for the accused
History Advocates:
Both Parties Represented
Case Outcome:
Accused sentenced to four years’ imprisonment
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAROK
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 40 OF 2017
REPUBLIC..................................................................................PROSECUTOR
VERSUS
SAMUEL KENINI KEIWUA............................................................ACCUSED
JUDGEMENT ON SENTENCE
1. The accused was convicted on his own plea of guilty to manslaughter.
2. The issue before me is one of assessing the appropriate sentence.
3. Mr. Kilele, counsel for the accused urged the following matters in mitigation. Accused is 20 years old. He is herdsman for the family livestock with no formal education. He is 1
st
offender and is remorseful.
4. This offence was committed over a fight over grazing rights and the fight took place on the land of the accused. The fighting involved members of the deceased and that of the accused.
5. Furthermore, the accused supports his ailing mother, who has psychiatric challenges. Mr. Kilele urged the court to take into account that there is an on-going process of reconciliation, which has been initiated by the family of the accused. This process will take up to 3 years. Accused has been on bail since 2017.
6. Ms. Torosi, counsel for the Republic informed the court that the accused is a first offender. She confirmed that that there is an on-going process of reconciliation
7. I have considered the probation officer’s report, which is very favourable to the accused.
8. After taking into account the mitigating and aggravating factors, I do not find that the accused is not suitable for a non-custodial sentence.
9. The upshot is that the accused is hereby sentenced to four years’ imprisonment.
J
udgment signed, dated and delivered at Narok this 28
th
day of October, 2020 in the presence of Ms. Torosi for the Republic and Mr. Tanyasis holding brief for Mr. Kilele for the accused.
J. M. BWONWONG’A.
J U D G E
28/10/2020