Case ID:165274

Magal Security Services Limited v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; Kenya Railways Corporation & 2 others (Interested Parties) [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Judicial Review Application Miscellaneous E013 of 2020

Parties:

Magal Security Services Limited v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; Kenya Railways Corporation, Horsebridge Network Systems (East Africa) Limited In Jv With Flir Systems (UK) & Achelis Kenya Limited, Dams Construction Limited, Otto Mruttu + Partners Architects, Armstrong & Duncan, Brillitech Engneering Services Limited, Com Twenty -One Limited Glosec Solutions Limited (Consortium) (Interested Parties)

Date Delivered:

07 Oct 2020

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Pauline Nyamweya

Citation:

Magal Security Services Limited v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board; Kenya Railways Corporation & 2 others (Interested Parties) [2020] eKLR

Court Division:

Judicial Review

County:

Nairobi

Case Outcome:

Suit adopted

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. MISC E013 OF 2020

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INSTITUTE

JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS FOR ORDERS OF CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION

BETWEEN

MAGAL SECURITY SERVICES LIMITED........................................APPLICANT

VERSUS

THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD............................................RESPONDENT

AND

KENYA RAILWAYS CORPORATION

..........................1

ST

INTERESTED PARTY

HORSEBRIDGE NETWORK SYSTEMS (EAST AFRICA)

LIMITED IN JV WITH FLIR SYSTEMS (UK)..............

2

ND

INTERESTED PARTY

ACHELIS KENYA LIMITED, DAMS CONSTRUCTION

LIMITED, OTTO MRUTTU + PARTNERS ARCHITECTS,

ARMSTRONG & DUNCAN, BRILLITECH ENGNEERING

SERVICES LIMITED, COM TWENTY -ONE LIMITED GLOSEC

SOLUTIONS LIMITED (CONSORTIUM)

...................3

RD

INTERESTED PARTY

RULING

1. The

ex parte

Applicant, 1

ST

Interested Party, and 2

nd

Interested Party herein have filed a consent dated 17

th

September 2020 which is duly signed by their advocates. The consent is to the effect that the substantive application dated 5th August 2020 filed by the Applicant is hereby withdrawn, that this matter should be marked as withdrawn, and that each party to bear its own costs.

2. I note in this regard that while the Respondent filed a replying affidavit, the 3

rd

Interested Party did not file any pleadings herein.

3. In the premises I hereby order as follows:

I.

The consent dated 17

th

September 2020 is hereby adopted as an order of the Court, and this suit is hereby marked as withdrawn.

II.

Each party shall bear its respective costs of the suit.

III. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling to the

ex parte

Applicant, Respondents and Interested Parties by electronic mail by close of business on

Thursday, 8

th

October 2020

.

4. Orders accordingly.

DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 7

th

DAY OF OCTOBER 2020

P. NYAMWEYA

JUDGE