Case ID:165240

Clement Nderitu v ARM Cement Limited [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Cause 1668 of 2015

Parties:

Clement Nderitu v ARM Cement Limited

Date Delivered:

02 Oct 2020

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Radido Stephen Okiyo

Citation:

Clement Nderitu v ARM Cement Limited [2020] eKLR

Advocates:

Kiarie, Kabita, Kihunyu & Associates Advocates for the Claimant

Andrew & Steve Advocates for the Respondent

Court Division:

Employment and Labour Relations

County:

Nairobi

Advocates:

Kiarie, Kabita, Kihunyu & Associates Advocates for the Claimant

Andrew & Steve Advocates for the Respondent

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Case Outcome:

Preliminary Objection upheld

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI

CAUSE NO. 1668 OF 2015

CLEMENT NDERITU....................................CLAIMANT

VERSUS

ARM CEMENT LIMITED.........................RESPONDENT

RULING

1. Clement Nderitu (Claimant) instituted these legal proceedings against ARM Cement Ltd (Respondent) on 21 September 2015 and he stated the Issue in Dispute as

Unfair and unlawful termination of employment of Clement Nderitu.

2. On 17 August 2018, the Respondent was placed under administration by dint of section 560 of the Insolvency Act.

3. The Respondent thereafter filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 29 June 2020 seeking that the Cause be stood over until compliance with the requirements of section 560 of the Insolvency Act.

4. Pursuant to directions issued by the Court on 30 June 2020, the Respondent filed submissions on the Objection on 24 August 2020 (should have been filed before 3 July 2020) while the Claimant’s submissions were not on record by 10 July 2020 as directed.

5. The Court has considered the objection and the submissions.

6. Section 560(1)(d) of the Insolvency Act provides that

A person may begin or continue legal proceedings (including execution and distress) against the company under administration or the company’s property only with the consent of the administrator or with the approval of the court.

7. The Claimant did not deny that he had been alerted that the Respondent was placed under administration. He has not demonstrated that he has or had attempted to utilise the aforesaid provision of law which places a restriction in continuing legal proceedings against a company under administration.

8. The Court consequently upholds the Notice of Preliminary Objection and orders

(a) The Cause herein be stayed until further directions are given.

(b) Parties at liberty to apply.

9. Costs in the cause.

Delivered through Microsoft teams, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 2

nd

day of October 2020.

Radido Stephen

Judge

Appearances

For Claimant Kiarie, Kabita, Kihunyu & Associates Advocates

For Respondent Andrew & Steve Advocates

Court Assistant Judy Maina