Case ID:165129

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Swaleh Mwangi & Company Advocates v National Social Security Fund [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Tribunal Case 283 of 2013

Parties:

Swaleh Mwangi & Company Advocates v National Social Security Fund

Date Delivered:

12 Jul 2019

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Business Premises Rent Tribunal

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

MBICHI MBOROKI CHAIRMAN

Citation:

Swaleh Mwangi & Company Advocates v National Social Security Fund [2020] eKLR

Court Division:

Tribunal

Parties Profile:

Individual/Private Body/Association v Individual/Private Body/Association

County:

Nairobi

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL

TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 283 OF 2013 (NAIROBI)

SWALEH MWANGI & COMPANY ADVOCATES……...……………APPLICANT/TENANT

VERSUS

NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND…………….…………RESPONDENT/LANDLORD

JUDGEMENT

The Landlord/Respondent in the above reference served the Tenant/Applicant with the notice dated

7

th

February 2013

seeking to alter the terms of the Tenancy with effect from

1

st

May 2013

as hereunder;

1. Increase rent to

shs 50 per

square foot per month exclusive of VAT.

2. Increase service charge to

26/=

per square foot per month exclusive of VAT.

The Tenant did not wish to comply with the above notice and filed the reference in the Tribunal. The reference was filed on

26

th

April 2013.

The record of the Tribunal shows the following;

1. The Landlord filed the valuation report on

23

rd

March 2015.

The Landlord’s report had been prepared by Real Appraisal Limited.

2. The Tenant filed the valuation report on

12

th

March 2015.

3. On

11

th

April 2019

, the Tribunal made an order that the lettable area in the Tenant’s valuation report shall be adopted for the purposes of the judgement.

It was stated from the bar that the Landlord’s valuers were not co-operative in the preparation of the joint report on the lettable area. The mandate of the Tribunal now is to evaluate the valuation reports and make a determination of the reference.

Summary of the Landlord’s Valuation Report

The Landlord’s valuation report has been prepared by Real Appraisal Limited. The report dated

16

th

March 2015.

Situation

8

th

floor Hazina Towers which is sandwiched between View Park Towers and Kemu Plaza along Utalii Lane.

Page 6

of the report.

Lettable area/accommodation at

page 7, 1467

square feet. Current rent

Rent

kshs 28

per square feet and service charge of

26

per square foot per month.

Comparables

The Landlord’s valuation report has

10

comparables

page 10, 11

and

12

of the valuation report.

Comparables 2, 4, 5, 6

are from the immediate neighborhood and are most suitable.

At page

13,

the rent payable in respect of Hazina Towers and View Park Towers

is shs 65

per square foot per month.

The Landlord’s valuation recommends

shs 70 per

square foot per month for rent and service charges of

shs 35.

This is the rate according to the Landlord’s valuation which should have applied in the lettable area.

Summary of the Tenant’s Valuer Valuation Report

The Tenant’s valuation report has been prepared by Paragon Property Valuers Ltd. The report is dated

30

th

January 2015.

Situation:

The Tenant’s Valuer agrees with the Landlord’s valuation on the situation (page 2) of the report. Lettable area

1,313.60 square feet.

Rental analysis

Shs 29.14

rent.

Shs 21.22

service charge.

Comparables

The Tenant’s valuation report has 7 comparables 1, 3 and 7 are from the immediate neighborhood. The other comparables are not from the immediate neighborhood. The Tenant’s valuers has not considered the rent payable by other Tenants in Hazina Towers which is the same premises where the Tenants operate from. The Tenant’s valuer recommends a rate of

shs 35.14

for rent and

shs 18.01

service charge.

Evaluation of the Valuation Reports

The Tribunal upon consideration of the valuation report is satisfied that comparables from Hazina Towers and View Park Towers are the most suitable. There is no credible reason why the Tenant’s valuer ignored comparables from Hazina Towers.

A landlord is entitled to harmonized rent from the Tenants in the same building

The rate at Hazina Towers and View Park Towers is

shs 65

for the rent and service charge of

shs 32.5.

The Landlord’s notice seeks a rent of

shs 50

and service charge of

shs 26.

The Tribunal cannot assess the rent more than what the Landlord sought in the notice.

The Tribunal adopts the Landlord’s valuation recommendations on the rent and service charge but will in the circumstances of the case assess the rent as per the Landlord’s notices which is below the open market rent.

The Tribunal assesses the rent payable as hereunder;

a.

Rent

1,313.60 x 50 = 65,680.

b. Service charge

1,313.60 x 26 =

34.153

.

Total

99,833

per month

Effective Date:

The Landlord delayed in filing the valuation report and the effective date in the circumstances of the case shall be

1

st

January 2015.

Costs:

Costs follow the event. The Landlord has succeeded in the reference and is entitled to costs.

The Tribunal makes the following determination in the reference.

Orders

1. The rent payable by the Tenant is assessed at

shs 99,833

per month inclusive of service charge and is exclusive of VAT with effect from 1

st

January 2015.

2. The Tenant shall pay the Landlord costs of the reference.

3. Costs shall be agreed or taxed by the Tribunal.

4. The Tenant shall pay the arrears of rent arising out of the judgment within 6 months from the date herein in default the Landlord shall levy distress.

5. The Landlord is at liberty to serve the Tenant with a fresh notice to vary the terms of the rent and service charge after expiry of 12 months from the date of the judgment in the circumstances of this case.

Judgment

delivered this

12

th

day of

July 2019

in the presence of

Mr Ndome

holding brief for

Mwangi

for the

Applicant/Tenant

,

Miss Mora

holding brief for

Macharia

for the

Landlord.

MBICHI MBOROKI

CHAIRMAN

BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Tribunal Case 283 of 2013', 'Parties:': 'Swaleh Mwangi & Company Advocates v National Social Security Fund', 'Date Delivered:': '12 Jul 2019', 'Case Class:': 'Civil', 'Court:': 'Business Premises Rent Tribunal', 'Case Action:': 'Judgment', 'Judge(s):': 'MBICHI MBOROKI CHAIRMAN', 'Citation:': 'Swaleh Mwangi & Company Advocates v National Social Security Fund [2020] eKLR', 'Court Division:': 'Tribunal', 'Parties Profile:': 'Individual/Private Body/Association v Individual/Private Body/Association', 'County:': 'Nairobi', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}