Case ID:163254

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Vincent Nunde Murunga v Republic [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Application 59 of 2020

Parties:

Vincent Nunde Murunga v Republic

Date Delivered:

01 Sep 2020

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Kakamega

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Roselyne Ekirapa Aburili

Citation:

Vincent Nunde Murunga v Republic [2020] eKLR

Case History:

(Being an application seeking for sentence reduction from original Butali PM’s Court Criminal Case No. 105 of 2013, Kakamega HC Cr. A No. 175 of 2013 and, Kisumu Court of Appeal Cr. Appeal No. 211 of 2018)

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Kakamega

History Docket No:

Criminal Appeal 211 of 2018

History County:

Kakamega

Case Outcome:

Application dismissed.

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2020

VINCENT NUNDE MURUNGA

.................................................

APPLICANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC.................................................................................RESPONDENT

(Being an application seeking for sentence reduction from original Butali PM’s Court Criminal Case No. 105 of 2013, Kakamega HC Cr. A No. 175 of 2013 and, Kisumu Court of Appeal Cr. Appeal No. 211 of 2018)

RULING

1.

The applicant VINCENT NUNDE MURUNGA is serving a 20 year prison term which was reduced from death sentence imposed by the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Butali, in Butali PM CR. Case No. 105 of 2013 upon conviction for the Offence of

Robbery with Violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code.

His appeal to the Kakamega High Court vide Kakamega High Court Criminal Appeal No. 175 of 2013, was dismissed by a 2 judge bench on 30.9.2015. He appealed to the Court of Appeal which dismissed the appeal against conviction but reduced sentence to 20 years imprisonment vide

Court of Appeal Criminal Appeal No. 211 of 2018 at Kisumu Court of Appeal.

2.

He now brings this application which is not even signed, seeking for sentence reduction to non-custodial sentence because his family is suffering.

3.

I have considered the

prima facie

incompetent applications.

4.

This Court is devoid of Jurisdiction to entertain a sentence reduction application where the Court of Appeal already reduced the sentence from death to custodial term.

5.

Furthermore, the applicant has by passed the Geographical Jurisdictional channels and come all the way to Siaya High Court to ventilate his grievances yet he was convicted by Courts exercising jurisdiction within Kakamega.

6.

For the above dual reasons, I hereby find this application to be fatally incompetent, devoid of merit and an abuse of Court process. The same is hereby dismissed and this file is closed.

7.

Orders accordingly.

Dated, Signed and Delivered at Siaya this 1

st

Day of September, 2020

R. E. ABURILI

JUDGE

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Criminal Application 59 of 2020', 'Parties:': 'Vincent Nunde Murunga v Republic', 'Date Delivered:': '01 Sep 2020', 'Case Class:': 'Criminal', 'Court:': 'High Court at Kakamega', 'Case Action:': 'Ruling', 'Judge(s):': 'Roselyne Ekirapa Aburili', 'Citation:': 'Vincent Nunde Murunga v Republic [2020] eKLR', 'Case History:': '(Being an application seeking for sentence reduction from original Butali PM’s Court Criminal Case No. 105 of 2013, Kakamega HC Cr. A No. 175 of 2013 and, Kisumu Court of Appeal Cr. Appeal No. 211 of 2018)', 'Court Division:': 'Criminal', 'County:': 'Kakamega', 'History Docket No:': 'Criminal Appeal 211 of 2018', 'History County:': 'Kakamega', 'Case Outcome:': 'Application dismissed.', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}