Case ID:162846

Republic v Fredrick Mutuku [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Revision Case 539 of 2020

Parties:

Republic v Fredrick Mutuku

Date Delivered:

01 Jul 2020

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Jessie Wanjiku Lesiit

Citation:

Republic v Fredrick Mutuku [2020] eKLR

Case History:

(Being Revision of the Order in Judgment of Hon. Lilian Arika (SPM) in Milimani Chief Magistrate’s Criminal Case No. 1587 of 2017 dated 26th September, 2019)

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Nairobi

History Docket No:

Criminal Case 1587 of 2017

History Magistrate:

Hon. Lilian Arika (SPM)

History County:

Nairobi

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT NAIROBI

HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO. 539 OF 2020

LESIIT, J

REPUBLIC.................................................. PROSECUTOR

VERSUS

FREDRICK MUTUKU.......................................ACCUSED

(Being Revision of the Order in Judgment of Hon. Lilian Arika (SPM) in

Milimani Chief Magistrate’s Criminal Case No. 1587 of 2017 dated 26

th

September, 2019)

RULING ON REVISION

1. The Learned Trial Magistrate in this case Hon. Lilian Arika, has made a formal request for review of finding made in this case as contained in her Judgment read in open court on 26

th

September, 2019.

2. I have perused the judgment of the Hon. Magistrate and I have found that the analysis and evaluation of the evidence led to a finding under the conclusion part of the judgment thus:

“

D. CONCLUSION

It is unfortunate that despite the huge loss to the complainant, the evidence on record failed to meet the standard set. It would be unsafe to convict on the same, for the reasons given. The upshot of the foregoing is that the accused person is convicted under section 215 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

On the issue of the exhibits 9a, 9b and 9c being one hundred and twenty padlocks, the same were on 11

th

June, 2019 released back to the investigating officer. If no appeal is preferred within 14 days, the same to be released for use by the complainant.

HON. ARIKA

SPM

26/9/2019

”

3. It is clear from the above excerpt that there is an error on the face of the record. The learned trial Magistrate concluded that it was unsafe to convict on the evidence on record but went ahead to enter a conviction under

section 215

of the

Criminal Procedure Code

. At the close of the judgment no sentence was passed, another indication that the Learned Trial Magistrate meant to acquit and not convict the accused person.

4. In exercise of the powers of revision under

section 362

and

section 364

of the

Criminal Procedure Code

, I correct the error on the face of the record by substituting the word

‘convicted’

in the said judgment with the word ‘

acquitted’

under

section 215

of the

Criminal Procedure Code

.

5. In the result, the accused person stands acquitted of the charges he faced in that case.

DATED IN NAIROBI THIS 1

ST

JULY, 2020.

LESIIT, J.

JUDGE