Case ID:162695
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Kevin Ouma Oloo & another v Republic [2020] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 20 of 2020
Parties:
Kevin Ouma Oloo & Fredrick Otieno Odindo v Republic
Date Delivered:
21 Jul 2020
Case Class:
Criminal
Court:
High Court at Siaya
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Roselyne Ekirapa Aburili
Citation:
Kevin Ouma Oloo & another v Republic [2020] eKLR
Case History:
An Application arising from Original Criminal Case No. 369/2017 at Principal Magistrate’s court, Siaya before Hon. J. Ong’ondo, PM and Judgment delivered vide Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 2018 at Siaya High Court dated 13.11.2019 before Hon. Lady Justice R.E. Aburili - Judge
Court Division:
Criminal
County:
Siaya
History Docket No:
Criminal Case 369/2017
History Magistrate:
on. J. Ong’ondo, PM
History County:
Siaya
Case Outcome:
Application dismissed
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT SIAYA
MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2020
KEVIN OUMA OLOO......................1
ST
APPLICANT
FREDRICK OTIENO ODINDO......2
ND
APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.............................................RESPONDENT
(An Application arising from Original Criminal Case No. 369/2017 at Principal Magistrate’s court, Siaya before Hon. J. Ong’ondo, PM and Judgment delivered vide Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 2018 at Siaya High Court dated 13.11.2019 before Hon. Lady Justice R.E. Aburili - Judge)
RULING
1. I have considered the application by the applicants
Kevin Ouma Oloo
and
Fredrick Otieno Odindo
who are before Bondo PM’s Court charged with the offence of Robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code. IN their application they aver that they are facing a retrial over the same offence that they were acquitted on in the previous trial. As the applicants claim that that they are charged with Count 1 for which they were initially acquitted of, I find that the said Plea of
autrefois acquit
can only be raised before the same court that is trying the applicants.
2. This application is therefore premature and misplaced. It is dismissed.
3. File closed.
4. Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya, this 21
st
Day of July, 2020
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE