Case ID:162400

Elroy Madegwa v Global Trucks Limited [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Industrial Cause 358 of 2014

Parties:

Elroy Madegwa v Global Trucks Limited

Date Delivered:

30 Jul 2020

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Mathews Nderi Nduma

Citation:

Elroy Madegwa v Global Trucks Limited [2020] eKLR

Advocates:

Mr. Maube for Respondent/Applicant

Mr. Wamalwa for Claimant/Respondent

Court Division:

Employment and Labour Relations

County:

Kisumu

Advocates:

Mr. Maube for Respondent/Applicant

Mr. Wamalwa for Claimant/Respondent

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Case Outcome:

Application dismissed with costs

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT

AT KISUMU

INDUSTRIAL CAUSE NO. 358 OF 2014

(Before Hon. Justice Mathews N. Nduma)

ELROY MADEGWA........................... CLAIMANT

VERSUS

GLOBAL TRUCKS LIMITED.......RESPONDENT

RULING

1. Application dated 3

rd

May 2019 sought stay of execution of the decree herein and that the applicant be allowed to liquidate the decretal amount by paying Kshs. 30,000 within 2 months from the date of the Application and pay the balance within a period of 12 months in installments of Kshs. 15,000 per month.

2. The application is opposed vide a replying affidavit dated 10

th

June 2019 and filed on 13

th

June 2019 in which the claimant/Respondent states that there is no good reason advanced by the respondent not to liquidate the decretal amount at once since the respondent is a well-established company operating in East Africa and can afford to liquidate the decretal sum at once.

3. The court has considered the depositions and submissions by the parties and is not satisfied that the respondent/applicant is not in a position to liquidate the decretal sum at once. Indeed, there has been considerable passage of time from the date the application was filed to date and the respondent ought to have liquidated the decretal sum by now.

4. The application lacks merit and is dismissed with costs.

Judgment Dated, Signed and delivered at Nairobi this 30

th

day of July, 2020

Mathews N. Nduma

Judge

ORDER

In view of the declaration of measures restricting court operations due to the COVID-19 pandemic and in light of the directions issued by his Lordship, the Chief Justice on 15

th

March 2020, this ruling has been delivered to the parties online with their consent. They have waived compliance with

Order 21 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

which requires that all judgments and rulings be pronounced in open court. In permitting this course, this court has been guided by

Article 159(2)(d)

of the Constitution which requires the court to eschew undue technicalities in delivering justice, the right of access to justice guaranteed to every person under

Article 48

of the Constitution and the provisions of

Section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act (chapter 21 of the Laws of Kenya)

which impose on this court the duty of the court,

inter alia

, to use suitable technology to enhance the overriding objective which is to facilitate just, expeditious, proportionate and affordable resolution of civil disputes.

Mathews N. Nduma

Judge

Appearances

Mr. Maube for Respondent/Applicant

Mr. Wamalwa for Claimant/Respondent

Chrispo: Court Clerk