Case ID:162390

ASL Credit Limited v Abdi Basid Sheikh Ali &

another [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Civil Case E111 of 2018

Parties:

ASL Credit Limited v Abdi Basid Sheikh Ali & Hafsa K S Ali

Date Delivered:

20 Jul 2020

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Margaret Waringa Muigai

Citation:

ASL Credit Limited v Abdi Basid Sheikh Ali &

another [2020] eKLR

Advocates:

CM Advocates LLP For Plaintiff/Applicant- Ms Mwangi

A.N.Oeri & Co For Defendant/Respondent- Ms Oeri

Court Division:

Commercial Tax & Admiralty

County:

Nairobi

Advocates:

CM Advocates LLP For Plaintiff/Applicant- Ms Mwangi

A.N.Oeri & Co For Defendant/Respondent- Ms Oeri

History Advocates:

Both Parties Represented

Case Outcome:

Application granted

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

COMMERCIAL & TAX DIVISION

HCCC NO E 111 OF 2018

ASL CREDIT LIMITED .........................PLAINTIFF

VERSUS

ABDI BASID SHEIKH ALI.........1

ST

RESPONDENT

RULING

By Certificate of Urgency Application filed by Plaintiff/Applicant on 17

th

March 2020, the Applicant sought that the Court orders of 3

rd

October 2019, where Hon. L.J M. Kasango dismissed the Plaintiff’s suit for non-attendance by the Plaintiff/Applicant be set aside and vacated and the suit reinstated.

The Plaintiff/Applicant instituted by Plaint and filed on 9

th

October 2018 for hearing of the Plaintiff’s application filed on 17

th

October 2018.

The Plaintiff/Applicant is apprehensive that its legitimate rights as pursued in the Plaint will be extinguished and the Plaintiff will be condemned unheard and subsequently suffer irreparable loss and damage.

The grounds relied upon are that although the Plaintiff served the Defendant with the application for hearing of the matter on 10

th

July 2019, Counsel was unwell and the Court stood over the matter to another date to be taken by parties.

The Plaintiff took the date of 3

rd

October 2019. The Clerk erroneously and through honest mistake failed to notify the advocate on record the date fixed for the hearing of the application. The advocate failed to attend Court.

The Court on its own motion dismissed the whole suit for non-attendance whereas the matter was coming up for hearing of the application.

The Plaintiff/Applicant sought to peruse the Court file but was unable to trace the same. When the Applicant found and perused the Court file he confirmed the above facts.

The Plaintiff/Applicant wishes to have the dismissed application dated 17

th

October 2018 and the suit filed on 9

th

October 2018 reinstated heard and determined by the Court.

It is in the interest of justice and fairness the suit and application should be heard and determined on merit.

By Affidavit of Service sworn on 17

th

June 2020 and filed through e-filing, the Applicant confirmed that the Defendant/Respondent was served on 17

th

June 2020 through advocates on record A. N.Oeri Advocates with the Hearing Notice and Certificate of Urgency application.

DETERMINATION

On 2

nd

July 2020, the Application was heard through virtual conference exparte, the Applicant applied for the suit and application and orders of 3

rd

October 2019 to be set aside and suit and application to be reinstated.

The application was unopposed, the Defendant/Respondent despite service failed to appear during proceedings and/or to be represented. No explanation, circumstances or reasons were explained to the Court to consider and no pleadings or documents were filed with regard to the instant application.

Order 12 & 17 CPR 2010

address the dismissal of suit for non-attendance and non-prosecution for 1 year.

Order 51 CPR 2010

addresses the process of hearing applications and where a party is absent then the Court proceeds exparte.

In the instant case both parties failed to appear and attend Court on 3

rd

October 2019, the Court dismissed the suit as per

Order 17 Rule 3 and Order 12 Rule 1 CPR

2010

for non-attendance of both parties.

The Applicant outlined in the instant application the reasons for non-attendance and non-prosecution of the application slated for hearing on 3

rd

October 2019. The mistake was by the Plaintiff Advocate’s Clerk who failed to diarize the date and inform Counsel and thus counsel did not attend court.

DISPOSITION

1. The Application is unopposed. The Application filed on 17

th

March 2020 is granted.

2. The Court orders of 3

rd

October 2019 are hereby set aside and vacated.

3. The application and suit are reinstated.

4. They shall be processed in the normal process for hearing and determination through Deputy Registrar Commercial & Tax Division.

DELIVERED SIGNED & DATED IN OPEN COURT ON 20

TH

JULY 2020. (VIRTUAL CONFERENCE)

M.W. MUIGAI

JUDGE

IN THE PRESENCE OF;

CM ADVOCATES LLP FOR PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT- MS MWANGI

A.N.OERI & CO FOR DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT- MS OERI

COURT ASSISTANT - TUPET