Case ID:162257

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Bernard Ouma Abai Jaugenya v Republic [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Petition 5 of 2020

Parties:

Bernard Ouma Abai Jaugenya v Republic

Date Delivered:

29 Jul 2020

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Siaya

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

Roselyne Ekirapa Aburili

Citation:

Bernard Ouma Abai Jaugenya v Republic [2020] eKLR

Advocates:

Mr. Okachi, SPPC for State

Case History:

Being an Application for Revision of Sentence and Conviction in Kisumu HCRA 134/2012 and

Originally from SPM’s court, Siaya vide Criminal Case No. 525 of 2011 before Hon. R.B. Ngetich

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Siaya

Advocates:

Mr. Okachi, SPPC for State

History Docket No:

Criminal Case 525 of 2011

History Magistrate:

Hon. R.B. Ngetich

History Advocates:

One party or some parties represented

Case Outcome:

Petition allowed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT SIAYA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5 OF 2020

(CORAM: R. E. ABURILI - J.)

BERNARD OUMA ABAI JAUGENYA......APPLICANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC................................................RESPONDENT

(Being an Application for Revision of Sentence and Conviction in Kisumu HCRA 134/2012 and

Originally from SPM’s court, Siaya vide Criminal Case No. 525 of 2011 before Hon. R.B. Ngetich)

JUDGMENT

1. The Petitioner

BERNARD OUMA ABAI JAUGENYA

was jointly with two others convicted of the offence of robbery with violence and sentenced to suffer death by Hon. R.B. Ngetich SPM (as she then was on 19/12/2012

vide Siaya PM Cr. Case No. 525/2011

.

2. He appealed to the High Court at Kisumu vide HCRA 134/2012 which appeal was dismissed and he appealed further to the

Court of Appeal vide CA 10/2014

which appeal was dismissed on 27/5/2016.

3. The Petitioner seeks for resentencing vide this Petition as he was handed maximum mandatory death penalty which was commuted to life imprisonment. This is pursuant to the

Francis Muruatetu decision SC Pet. No. 15 & 16 of 2014

.

4. The Petitioner submits that he regrets the offence, prays for leniency and that he was reformed. Certificates shown to the court show that he was trained in theology at Discovery Bible School and has a certificate in Health Education and counselling having trained in Mind Education Training. He has served about 10 years in prison from the time of his arrest.

5. The State acknowledges that the Petitioner has reformed and that he can be given an opportunity to serve custodial sentence but that the offence is heinous requiring deterrent sentence.

6. I have considered the Petition, submissions, testimonials and response by the State. I have also considered circumstances under which the offence was committed, the value of the property stolen and the nature of injuries sustained by the complainant. I have given equal consideration to the mitigation by the Petitioner.

7. The offence of robbery with violence is prompted by greed, reaping where one has not sown and in the process threatening life and limb. It is a heinous crime.

8. However, the Petitioner has shown remorse and reform. He is rehabilitated through life’s skills leant in the prison as shown by certificates filed in court.

9. The complainant did not sustain serious injuries. They were classified as harm and the weapons used in the robbery were not as lethal. They used clubs and rungus to assault and threaten the complainant.

10. I am in the circumstances satisfied that the Petitioner who readily accepts his mistakes and admits the offence and promises not to reoffend, deserves a chance back into the society.

11. Accordingly, I allow the Petition for resentencing and vacate the mandatory death sentence as commuted to life imprisonment and substitute it with a prison term of ten years to be calculated from the date of his arrest on19.12.2012. The Petitioner shall also be reporting, upon his release, to the area chief once every month on Fridays for the next twelve months from date of his release from prison.

12. Orders accordingly.

Dated, signed and delivered at Siaya, this 29

th

day of July, 2020

R.E. ABURILI

JUDGE

In the presence of:

Bernard Ouma Abai Jaugenya, Petitioner in person in prison via Microsoft teams

Mr. Okachi, SPPC for State

Court Assistants: Brenda Achieng and Modestar Mutiemani

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Criminal Petition 5 of 2020', 'Parties:': 'Bernard Ouma Abai Jaugenya v Republic', 'Date Delivered:': '29 Jul 2020', 'Case Class:': 'Criminal', 'Court:': 'High Court at Siaya', 'Case Action:': 'Judgment', 'Judge(s):': 'Roselyne Ekirapa Aburili', 'Citation:': 'Bernard Ouma Abai Jaugenya v Republic [2020] eKLR', 'Advocates:': 'Mr. Okachi, SPPC for State', 'Case History:': 'Being an Application for Revision of Sentence and Conviction in Kisumu HCRA 134/2012 and \nOriginally from SPM’s court, Siaya vide Criminal Case No. 525 of 2011 before Hon. R.B. Ngetich', 'Court Division:': 'Criminal', 'County:': 'Siaya', 'History Docket No:': 'Criminal Case 525 of 2011', 'History Magistrate:': 'Hon. R.B. Ngetich', 'History Advocates:': 'One party or some parties represented', 'Case Outcome:': 'Petition allowed', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}