Case ID:162254

JAO v Republic [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Revision 60 of 2020

Parties:

JAO v Republic

Date Delivered:

24 Jul 2020

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Siaya

Case Action:

Ruling

Judge(s):

Roselyne Ekirapa Aburili

Citation:

JAO v Republic [2020] eKLR

Case History:

Being an Application for Revision of sentence in Cr. Case No. 852 of 2018 in the Principal Magistrate’s Court, Bondo dated 29.10.2019 before Hon. E.N. Wasike, Senior Resident Magistrate

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Siaya

History Docket No:

Criminal Case 852 of 2018

History Magistrate:

Hon. E.N. Wasike, Senior Resident Magistrate

History County:

Siaya

Case Outcome:

Application for sentence revision is dismissed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA

AT SIAYA

CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 60 OF 2020

JAO..........................APPLICANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC.........RESPONDENT

(Being an Application for Revision of sentence in Cr. Case No. 852 of 2018 in the Principal Magistrate’s Court, Bondo dated 29.10.2019 before Hon. E.N. Wasike, Senior Resident Magistrate)

RULING

1. I have considered the Application for sentence revision.

2. I have considered the offence for which the convict applicant

JAO

was convicted on her own plea of guilty.

3. The offence was attempted arson but from the facts of the offence, the convict was in a way attempting suicide and wanted to die with the complainant’s young children by locking them in a house where she was and setting the house on fire. The children are lucky to be alive and so is the convict.

4. The Probation Report as filed shows that the convict had issues with her husband. She is also HIV positive and that she loiters here and there.

5. The offence could have been worse - murder and suicide, had she succeeded in her vengeance.

6. The complainant’s children are not responsible for convict’s woes. The convict is a young adult who must learn to be a responsible person. She requires life’s skills which she can get from prison as she was imprisoned on short term. Three (3) years imprisonment is too lenient as she did not even mitigate.

7. She requires serious rehabilitation and reformation. She can learn many skills which will help her in her future life, while she is in prison.

8. For the above reasons, I decline to revise the lawful lenient sentence imposed on her by the trial court.

9. The application for sentence revision is dismissed.

10. File closed.

Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya, this 24

th

Day of July 2020.

R.E. ABURILI

JUDGE