Case ID:160437
Parties: None
Date Delivered: None
Case Type: None
Court: None
Judges: None
Citation: None
Vlan Construction Limited v Rama Homes Limited [2020] eKLR
Case Metadata
Case Number:
Civil Case E 341 of 2019
Parties:
Vlan Construction Limited v Rama Homes Limited
Date Delivered:
25 Jun 2020
Case Class:
Civil
Court:
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts Commercial and Tax Division)
Case Action:
Ruling
Judge(s):
Mary Muhanji Kasango
Citation:
Vlan Construction Limited v Rama Homes Limited [2020] eKLR
Court Division:
Commercial Tax & Admiralty
County:
Nairobi
Disclaimer:
The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
COMMERCIAL AND ADMIRALTY DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. E 341 OF 2019
VLAN CONSTRUCTION LIMITED
...........................PLAINTIFF
-
VERSUS -
RAMA HOMES LIMITED
...................................... DEFENDANT
RULING
1. I am hard pressed to refer to this as a Ruling. What is before me in the form of an application, Notice of Motion dated 21
st
February 2020, is nothing short of an abuse of the court process.
2. This court by a Ruling dated 14
th
November 2019 decline to grant prayers sought by VLan Construction Ltd, the Plaintiff, in the Notice of Motion application dated 7
th
October 2019. The plaintiff sought various injunctive orders, by that application, seeking to restrain Rama Homes Limited (the defendant) from engaging another sub-contractor until joint inspection was conducted; to restrain the defendant from interfering or removing the plaintiff’s machinery, equipment and construction material until joint inspection was conducted and; to restrain the defendant from hiring or engaging another sub-contractor until joint inspection was done.
3. It is not denied that the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract for main structure works of a development called Jumeirah Heights. The plaintiff was the sub-contractor and the defendant was the employer. The defendant alleges the plaintiff breached the contract and failed to complete construction. When the defendant inquired of the delay, the defendant alleges the plaintiff voluntarily vacated the site.
4. After hearing the plaintiff’s injunction application dated 7
th
October 2019 this court by its Ruling of 14
th
November 2019 dismissed that application.
5. The plaintiff filed yet another application subject of this Ruling dated 21
st
February 2020. The prayers in that application are convoluted and inept. There is no other way of describing them. They partly seek orders in relation to plaintiff’s machinery which is allegedly held by the defendant which was decided by this court by its Ruling of 14
th
November 2019. It also seek orders in relation to a matter,
Misc. Appl. No. E 633 of 2019 VLAN CONSTRUCTION LTD V RAMA HOMES LTD
, which matter is under the conduct of
Justice W. A. Okwany
.
6. The application dated 21
st
February 2020, without further ado
will be dismissed because seeking to relitigate the issue of machinery is an abuse of court process and the issue is res judicata and seeking to litigate about consent entered in Misc Appl. No. E 633 of 2019, in this file is fatal. The application is frivolous.
CONCLUSION
7. The application dated 21
st
February 2020 is dismissed. The status quo order issued on 28
th
February 2020 is vacated. At the reading of this Ruling a date for Case Management Conference will be fixed before me.
DATED, SIGNED
and
DELIVERED
at
NAIROBI
this
25
TH
day of
JUNE
2020.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE
Before Justice Mary Kasango
C/A Sophie
For the Plaintiff:
For the Defendant:
ORDER
This decision is hereby virtually delivered this
25
TH
day of
June, 2020.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE