Case ID:159052

Benard King’ola Mutungi & another v Ngusye Mutungi & another [2020]eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Environment and Land Case 04 of 2018

Parties:

Benard King’ola Mutungi & Paul M. Mutungi (Deceased) v Ngusye Mutungi & Chairman Malili Ranching Co. Ltd

Date Delivered:

29 May 2020

Case Class:

Civil

Court:

Environment and Land Court at Makueni

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

Charles Gitonga Mbogo

Citation:

Benard King’ola Mutungi & another v Ngusye Mutungi & another [2020]eKLR

Court Division:

Environment and Land

County:

Makueni

Case Outcome:

Suit dismissed

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT

AT MAKUENI

ELC CASE NO.04 OF 2018

BENARD KING’OLA MUTUNGI

PAUL M. MUTUNGI (DECEASED)..........................................PLAINTIFFS

-VERSUS

NGUSYE MUTUNGI..........................................................1

ST

DEFENDANT

THE CHAIRMAN

MALILI RANCHING CO. LTD..............DEFENDANT

J U D G E M E N T

1. The Plaintiff commenced this suit by way of a plaint dated 05

th

January, 2018 and filed in court on 24

th

January, 2018. He prays for judgement against the Defendants jointly and severally for: -

i. Revocation and/or Annul the title deed issued to the 1

st

defendant.

i. Cost of this suit and interest.

iii. Any other relief the court may deem fit and jest.

2. He has averred in paragraphs 4, 6 and 12 of his plaint that before his father died on 25

th

March, 2006, the latter was the registered owner of all that parcel of land at Malili being agricultural plot balloted 015 and commercial plot balloted 1941, that he has built his home on agricultural plot balloted 015 and carried farming on it and that he has the legal rights over the suitland being the property of his father.

3. His claim is denied by the 2

nd

Defendant vide its statement of defence dated 08

th

March, 2018 and filed in court on 09

th

March, 2018.

4. The 2

nd

Defendant has averred in paragraphs 3, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of its defence that the 1

st

Defendant is the legal owner of agricultural plot number 015 Malili Ranch Company Limited by virtue of her membership to the said Company, that the late Mutungi Wambua transferred his share to the 1

st

Defendant prior to his death and the change was procedurally and lawfully effected in the 2

nd

Defendant’s official record, that plot number 015 is the property of the 1

st

Defendant and that the Plaintiff has no proprietary rights or beneficial interest in the said property, that the Plaintiff’s suit does not raise any reasonable cause of action and prays for the same to be dismissed or struck out with costs and that the suit is non starter, incompetent and fatally defective in that the Plaintiff lacks the requisite locus standi to institute the suit for want of letters of administration and notice is given that a preliminary objection shall be raised to have the entire suit struck out in limine.

5. The 1

st

Defendant though served with notice to enter appearance and to file her defence failed to do so as can be seen from the affidavit of service sworn at Machakos on 09

th

April, 2018 and filed in court on even date.

6. Hearing of the Plaintiff’s case proceeded in the absence of the 2

nd

Defendant and his advocate who though served with a hearing notice failed to present themselves for hearing.

7. On the 29

th

March, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a reply to the 2

nd

Defendant’s defence the same being dated 19

th

March, 2018.

8. During the hearing of the Plaintiff’s case, he adopted his statements dated 05

th

January, 2018 as his evidence. He went on to produce five documents in his list of documents dated 11

th

June, 2018 as P.Exhibit Nos.1 to 5 respectively. The documents in question were allotment of agricultural commercial plot (P.Exhibit No.1), letter from the area chief addressed to the Chairman of Malili Ranch Co. Ltd dated 09

th

July, 2012 (P.Exhibit No.2), undated transfer deed (P.Exhibit No.3), certificate of death of Mutungi Wambua (P.Exhibit No.4), structured Kamba/English translated will written by Mutungi Wambua dated 08

th

July, 2004 (P.Exhibit No.5).

9. Briefly, his evidence was that the Plaintiff is the son of Mutungi Wambua (deceased) who was the registered owner of agricultural plot number 015 and commercial plot number 1941. That upon the demise of the deceased, the 1

st

Defendant caused the change of name in the share certificate and allotment letter from that of the deceased to herself. The Plaintiff further states that the Defendant caused the aforementioned changes to be carried out without his knowledge.

10. It is also the Plaintiff’s case that he resides in the agricultural plot number 015. He accuses the 1

st

Defendant of trying to stop him from utilizing his share of the land in question as a dependant and a beneficiary of the estate of his deceased father.

11. In his submissions the Plaintiff has urged the Court to dismiss the 2

nd

Defendant’s defence as no evidence was led in support of the same and proceed to enter judgement in his favour.

12. I have read the evidence on record and it is clear to me that the Plaintiff is litigating over the estate of his deceased father. This would explain why the Plaintiff who had started to testify on 31

st

July, 2018 successfully sought to be stood down so that he could apply for the necessary grant of letters of administration to enable him to sustain this suit.

13. On 14

th

February, 2019 the Plaintiff was granted a chance to regularize his pleadings which chance he did not utilize. He instead filed a copy of letters of administration intestate issued on 06

th

August, 2019 in succession cause No.49 of 2018 by the Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court at Makueni. The grant in question does not permit him to file and prosecute the instant suit in the absence of grant of letters of administration ad litem. The Plaintiff’s case is not helped by his document marked as P.Exhibit No.5 which he says is a will by his father written in Kamba language and translated into English as the two would have been appropriate in a succession cause.

14. The Plaintiff has by implication of his pleadings and his evidence indicated that the 1

st

defendant unprocedurally had the share certificate in respect of the suit property changed in her name. That would connote fraud. It is trite law that fraud must not only be pleaded but must also be particularized. The plaintiff herein has failed to do so.

15. From the foregoing, it is clear that the Plaintiff’s suit is incompetent and fatally defective for lack of the requisite locus standi. It must therefore fail. In the circumstances, I hereby proceed to dismiss it with no orders as to costs.

Signed, Dated and Delivered at Makueni via email this

29

th

day of

May, 2020.

MBOGO C. G.,

JUDGE.

Mr. G. Kwemboi – Court Assistant