Case ID:158432

Parties: None

Date Delivered: None

Case Type: None

Court: None

Judges: None

Citation: None


Jackton Owour Okatch v Republic [2020] eKLR

Case Metadata

Case Number:

Criminal Appeal 40 of 2019

Parties:

Jackton Owour Okatch v Republic

Date Delivered:

05 May 2020

Case Class:

Criminal

Court:

High Court at Siaya

Case Action:

Judgment

Judge(s):

Roselyne Ekirapa Aburili

Citation:

Jackton Owour Okatch v Republic [2020] eKLR

Case History:

(Being an appeal against judgment, conviction and sentence from the judgment in the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Bondo in Criminal[S.O.] Case No. 68 of 2018 dated 31.5.2019 by Hon. E. N. WASIKE, Senior Resident Magistrate.)

Court Division:

Criminal

County:

Siaya

History Magistrate:

Hon. EN Wasike (SRM)

History County:

Siaya

Case Outcome:

Appellant to be re-tried

Disclaimer:

The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2019

JACKTON OWOUR OKATCH ……………………………….... APPELLANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC ……………………………………………………... RESPONDENT

(Being an appeal against judgment, conviction and sentence from the judgment in the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Bondo in Criminal[S.O.] Case No. 68 of 2018 dated 31.5.2019 by Hon. E. N. WASIKE, Senior Resident Magistrate.)

JUDGMENT VIA SKYPE

1. I have perused the trial Court record. I observe that the witnesses though sworn, the record does not show in which language they testified and/or which language was used by the witnesses and/or the Appellant.

2. This omission offends Sections 197 and 198 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 50(2) (m) of the Constitution which guarantee the accused person the right to be tried in a language that they understand and to be provided with free language interpretation.

3. I find the trial of the Appellant was vitiated by the omission to indicate which language the trial took place. I quash the appellant’s conviction and set aside the sentence imposed on the Appellant.

4. I order that the Appellant

Jackton Owuor Okatch

shall be re-tried before Bondo Principal Magistrate’s Court.

5. Orders accordingly.

Dated, Signed and Delivered at Siaya this 5

th

Day of May, 2020 via skype due to covid 19 situattion.

R. E. ABURILI

JUDGE

Meta Info:

{'Case Number:': 'Criminal Appeal 40 of 2019', 'Parties:': 'Jackton Owour Okatch v Republic', 'Date Delivered:': '05 May 2020', 'Case Class:': 'Criminal', 'Court:': 'High Court at Siaya', 'Case Action:': 'Judgment', 'Judge(s):': 'Roselyne Ekirapa Aburili', 'Citation:': 'Jackton Owour Okatch v Republic [2020] eKLR', 'Case History:': '(Being an appeal against judgment, conviction and sentence from the judgment in the Principal Magistrate’s Court at Bondo in Criminal[S.O.] Case No. 68 of 2018 dated 31.5.2019 by Hon. E. N. WASIKE, Senior Resident Magistrate.)', 'Court Division:': 'Criminal', 'County:': 'Siaya', 'History Magistrate:': 'Hon. EN Wasike (SRM)', 'History County:': 'Siaya', 'Case Outcome:': 'Appellant to be re-tried', 'Disclaimer:': 'The information contained in the above segment is not part of the judicial opinion delivered by the Court. The metadata has been prepared by Kenya Law as a guide in understanding the subject of the judicial opinion. Kenya Law makes no warranties as to the comprehensiveness or accuracy of the information'}